It gets to the point that when players join an online intra-state table, it’s like being at an in-person home game where everybody knows everybody.Īll of which brings us back to the concept of a multi-state compact. There just aren’t enough players when the games are so severely geo-fenced. That’s what has been wrong with intra-state poker. The concept of having more poker players available is known as “liquidity” and poker needs liquidity to thrive. In cash games, a larger pool of players also means that operators can also offer a wider range of games and at different price points.

In tournaments, having more players available means a greater variety of poker styles can be offered, and prize pools are bigger. Bottom-line, by joining the agreement (aka MSIGA), Pennsylvania would be allowing the commonwealth’s players to face players from the other member states of the compact: Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey and most recently, Michigan. The issue is whether Pennsylvania joins the Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement. Tom Wolf is going to check, raise, call or fold on allowing the state’s online poker players to play their game in the best environment possible. However, Pennsylvania has been in the tank more than a year now and there’s no telling when the administration of Gov. He or she sits there, usually in stony silence, thinking and thinking and thinking. Rather, in poker, going in the tank means that a player is taking a long time - perhaps, even an excessive amount of time - to make a decision during a hand. Poker players know the expression, which has a different definition in their game apart from other competitions where “tanking” means not giving an honest effort.

Online poker real money pennsylvania